Aesthethic over Function?
But why would you prefer an aesthetic training over an functional training if you can also reach good resulst on a functional routine, while building strength at the same time.
For example:
This is Dave Gulledge, after an injury he started to go on a cut to reduce his bodyfat, resulting in this well trained body.
holy crap, he is built
ReplyDeletefunction for me
ReplyDeleteholy shit... that guy is HUGE
ReplyDeleteThats quite a difference. He looks big in either but a lot better in the second one. Never thought there were different training goals like that.
ReplyDeletethat cant be easy
ReplyDeleteWow I didn't know there were such extreme differences in either way of training. Very interesting!
ReplyDeleteGood read, always prefer functional strength
ReplyDeleteWow, I wouldn't think it would be the same guy
ReplyDeleteif that's what he wanted...
ReplyDeleteYep you are right ! I have heard that before that you dont have to lift 5000000 Tons of weights you can only strech urself and be a machine again :)
ReplyDeletewow
ReplyDeletewell, there's my target for two years time :)
ReplyDeleteFunctionality > aesthetics
ReplyDeleteNot saying he doesn't look good that way, he does, but the fat is there for a reason... It's why the strongest men don't look like bodybuilders.
not my thing.
ReplyDeleteYeah it's a little weird, where is my creatine?
ReplyDeleteDave need bigger lats.
ReplyDeleteDude... cool blog! I love keeping fit. If you're in vegas, lets grab a morning coffee sometime :)
ReplyDeletefunctional !!!
ReplyDeleteI would NOT want to meet him in a dark alley at night!
ReplyDeleteAs long as it's healthy... I mean, was a body made for stuff like this?
ReplyDeletefunction > aesthetic imo, cool post.
ReplyDeleteFollow my new blog@
http://diysweetie.blogspot.com/
im mirin aesthetics
ReplyDeletei could take him, np
ReplyDeleteWhy do men get extremely buff?
ReplyDeleteMating... thats why.
Functionality > aesthetics... but their not trying to achieve functionality.
dang that definitely worked out for him
ReplyDeletewow he looks like a character from a superhero movie!
ReplyDeleteReally interesting post.
ReplyDeleteLoving your new post. Makes me want to try it too.
ReplyDeleteLooks good. But being the strongest is about being the strongest and not about being the most muscled. Thats why it always annoys me when people watch StrongMan and say: but that doesn't look nice anymore, they look fat.
ReplyDeleteWould be the same as me seeing a guitar player who's fat and I would say: that's not pretty.
It's not about that at all.
ha, age old "fashion over function"
ReplyDeletethats insane stuff!
ReplyDeleteintriguing.. thanks for letting me follow you this morning with my COFFEE :)
ReplyDeleteNice job the dude has done. Nice blog, will follow!
ReplyDeleteThat dude is ripped!!
ReplyDeleteDunno, I actually prefer a "lumberjack" look to a bodybuilder. :D
ReplyDeleteSerious change, sure he did a lot of, "things".
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind looking like that
ReplyDeleteThat dude on the right is JACKED
ReplyDeletestrength > overexposed muscles
ReplyDeleteGood lord, I wonder how long it took him to get that beast...
ReplyDeleteGreat content on your blog, followed. Take a look at mine sometime:
http://serenityindex.blogspot.com/
the guy looks good! hes huge in both pics
ReplyDeleteJesus what a transformation!
ReplyDeleteAesthethic for me :>
ReplyDeleteThis guy looks good (no homo) second pic is better though, I'm starting training tomorrow too. I won't get as ripped as him though, just a bit fitter :D
ReplyDeleteI'll take function over form anytime!
ReplyDeletethe difference between those training ways are the repititions and the weight lifted.
ReplyDeletedrugs online pharmacy site
buying Viaga Super Active online there